BookDigger.com Home
Science Books
Anthropology
Aquaculture
Aquatic Chemistry
Artificial Life
Astronomy
Astrophysics
Atmospheric Science
Bioenergy
Botany
Cartography
Chaos Theory
Chemical Synthesis
Chemistry
Chromatography
Climate Change
Climatology
Cognitive Science
Combinatorial Chemistry
Computed Tomography
Creationism
Cryptozoology
DNA Sequencing
Ecology
Economics
Endangered Species
Entropy
Environmental Science
Enzymology
Epidemiology
Evolution
Extinct Animals
Fringe Science
Genetics
Geochemistry
Geography
Geology
Geophysics
Global Warming
GPS Systems
Gravity
Herpetology
Hurricanes
Hydrology
Immunology
Kinesiology
Kinetics
Magazines, Science
Materials Science
Microbiology
Molecular Biology
Molecular Modelling
Neuroscience
Nonlinear Science
Ocean Science
Oceanography
Optics
Organic Chemistry
Paleontology
Parasitology
Pharmacology
Physics
Physiology
Planetary Science
Polymer Science
Psychology
Quantum Chemistry
Quantum Physics
Reflexology
Reproductive Science
Science Dictionaries
Science Experiments
Science Fair Projects
Science History
Scientific Techniques
Sociology
Solar Power
Space Science
Space Travel
Statistics
Superconductivity
Themodynamics
Tornados
Toxicology
Virology
Volcanos
Weather Forecasting
Weather Science
Zoology

All Science Books
View Cart | Help

The Republican War on Science


Home > Science Books > Ocean Science > Item 44


Previous Ocean Science Book Next Ocean Science Book

Click here to buy The Republican War on Science by  Chris Mooney. The Republican War on Science
by Chris Mooney
Sales Rank: 214646
4.5 out of 5 stars
List Price: $14.95
$10.17
At Amazon
on 10-10-2008
Buy The Republican War on Science Now!

  • Paperback: 376 pages
  • Publisher: Basic Books August 28, 2006
  • Language: English
  • ISBN-10: 0465046762
  • ISBN-13: 978-0465046768
  • Product Dimensions: 7.9 x 5.3 x 1 inches
  • Shipping Weight: 12.8 ounces

    From Publishers Weekly
    Starred Review. Does the Bush administration ignore or deny mainstream research to please its conservative base? Have business groups and certain religious lobbies helped it do so? Does Bush-era treatment of scientists differ from that of Clinton, George H.W. Bush and Reagan? Has a Republican Congress passed laws designed to disable clean air and water efforts, and has it dismantled safeguards, such as the Congressional Office of Technology Assessment, meant to give legislators unbiased advice? Mooney's passionate, thoroughly researched volume answers these questions with an urgent "yes." A former American Prospect writer who is making his book debut, Mooney uses interviews and old-fashioned document-digging to explain how, over two decades, right-wing politicians built institutions designed to discredit working scientists; how some energy companies have allied themselves with powerful Republicans (such as Sen. James Inhofe of Oklahoma) to block or reverse U.S. steps to curb global warming; and how the present administration defies expert consensus on climate change, on mercury pollution, even on how to read statistics. Mooney tracks Bush White House efforts to spread misinformation about stem cells; the work of religious right regulators like Dr. David Hager (formerly on the FDA's Reproductive Health Drugs advisory committee) in restricting access to birth control; and the attempts of the Discovery Institute (and other think tanks linked to the Bush base) to fight the teaching of evolution. In the past five years, Mooney documents, many formerly apolitical physicists, biologists and doctors have come to believe there is a "pattern" of science abuse under Bush, a push back against the methods of science itself. Conservatives may react with indignation; liberals, moderates and working scientists will find few surprises,but Mooney's very readable, and understandably partisan, volume is the first to put the whole story, thoroughly documented, in one place.
    Copyright © Reed Business Information, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. --This text refers to the Hardcover edition.

    From Scientific American
    Thomas Jefferson would be appalled. More than two centuries after he helped to shape a government based on the idea that reason and technological advancement would propel the new United States into a glorious future, the political party that now controls that government has largely turned its back on science. Even as the country and the planet face both scientifically complex threats and remarkable technological opportunities, many Republican officeholders reject the most reliable sources of information and analysis available to guide the nation. As inconceivable as it would have been to Jefferson--and as dismaying as it is to growing legions of today's scientists--large swaths of the government in Washington are now in the hands of people who don't know what science is. More ominously, some of those in power may grasp how research works but nonetheless are willing to subvert science's knowledge and expert opinion for short-term political and economic gains. That is the thesis of The Republican War on Science, by Chris Mooney, one of the few journalists in the country who specialize in the now dangerous intersection of science and politics. His book is a well-researched, closely argued and amply referenced indictment of the right wing's assault on science and scientists. Mooney's chronicle of what he calls "science abuse" begins in the 1970s with Richard Nixon and picks up steam with Ronald Reagan. But both pale in comparison to the current Bush administration, which in four years has: * Rejected the scientific consensus on global warming and suppressed an EPA report supporting that consensus.
    * Stacked numerous advisory committees with industry representatives and members of the religious Right.
    * Begun deploying a missile defense system without evidence that it can work.
    * Banned funding for embryonic stem cell research except on a claimed 60 cell lines already in existence, most of which turned out not to exist.
    * Forced the National Cancer Institute to say that abortion may cause breast cancer, a claim refuted by good studies.
    * Ordered the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention to remove information about condom use and efficacy from its Web site. Mooney explores these and many other examples, including George W. Bush's support for creationism. In almost every instance, Republican leaders have branded the scientific mainstream as purveyors of "junk science" and dubbed an extremist viewpoint--always at the end of the spectrum favoring big business or the religious Right--"sound science." One of the most insidious achievements of the Right, Mooney shows, is the Data Quality Act of 2000--just two sentences, written by an industry lobbyist and quietly inserted into an appropriations bill. It directs the White House's Office of Management and Budget to ensure that all information put out by the federal government is reliable. The law seems sensible, except in practice. It is used mainly by industry and right-wing think tanks to block release of government reports unfavorable to their interests by claiming they do not contain "sound science." For all its hostility to specific scientific findings, the Right never says it opposes science. It understands the cachet in the word. Perhaps Republicans sense what pollsters have known for decades--that the American public is overwhelmingly positive about science and that there is nothing to be gained by opposing a winner. Instead the Right exploits a misconception about science common among nonscientists--a belief that uncertainty in findings indicates fatally flawed research. Because most cutting-edge science--including most research into currently controversial topics--is uncertain, it is dismissed as junk. This naive understanding of science hands the Right a time-tested tactic. It does not claim that business interests or moral values trump the scientific consensus. Rather rightists argue that the consensus itself is flawed. Then they encourage a debate between the consensus and the extremist naysayers, giving the two apparently equal weight. Thus, Mooney argues, it seems reasonable to split the difference or simply to argue that there is too much uncertainty to, say, ban a suspect chemical or fund a controversial form of research. The Republican War on Science details political and regulatory debates that can be arcane and complex, engrossing reading only for dedicated policy wonks. Thankfully, Mooney is both a wonk and a clear writer. He covered many of the battles in real time for publications such as the Washington Post, Washington Monthly, Mother Jones and American Prospect. "When politicians use bad science to justify themselves rather than good science to make up their minds," Mooney writes, "we can safely assume that wrongheaded and even disastrous decisions lie ahead." Thomas Jefferson would, indeed, be appalled. Writing in 1799 to a young student whom he was mentoring, the patriot advised the man to study science and urged him to reject the "doctrine which the present despots of the earth are inculcating," that there is nothing new to be learned. He concluded by saying opposition to "freedom and science would be such a monstrous phenomenon as I cannot place among possible things in this age and this country."

    Boyce Rensberger directs the Knight Science Journalism Fellowships at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology and teaches in M.I.T.'s Graduate Program in Science Writing. For many years he was a science reporter and editor at the Washington Post. --This text refers to the Hardcover edition.

  • The Republican War on Science
    Available from Amazon
    Price: $10.17
    Updated on 10-10-2008

    Buy The Republican War on Science Now!


    Previous Ocean Science Book Next Ocean Science Book


    Search For Products:

    Powered by Arc Spider - Smart Shopping Search Engine   
    Privacy Statement

    Search:
    Keywords:
    In Association with Amazon.com


    NOTICE: All product prices, availability, and specifications
    are subject to verification by their respective retailers.


    Copyright © 2008 Dominant Systems Corporation
    info@bookdigger.com         Privacy Policy
    Last Modified : 10-10-2008